The enactment of Ethiopia’s Asset Recovery Proclamation No. 1364/2025 on 2nd May, 2025 marks a major development in the country’s fight against corruption, illicit enrichment, money laundering, and economic crimes. The proclamation was introduced in response to growing concerns regarding unexplained wealth, illegal financial flows, abuse of public resources, and the limitations of previous fragmented legal frameworks governing confiscation and recovery of criminal assets. The law seeks to ensure that no person benefits from unlawful conduct while simultaneously protecting the national economy from the destructive consequences of economic crimes.
The proclamation consolidates rules relating to asset tracing, freezing, seizure, confiscation, management, and recovery under a single comprehensive legal framework. Prior to this law, Ethiopia relied on scattered provisions found in anti-corruption, criminal, and procedural laws, which often created enforcement gaps and institutional confusion. The new proclamation attempts and to close those gaps by introducing detailed procedures and expanding the state’s authority to investigate and recover illicit assets.
2. Historical and Legal Background
Economic crimes have increasingly become a serious threat to Ethiopia’s financial system, public trust, foreign investment climate, and economic development. Illegal accumulation of wealth, tax evasion, corruption, organized financial crimes, and hidden assets have weakened public institutions and undermined confidence in governance. The government recognized that existing laws were insufficient to deal with sophisticated financial crimes and modern forms of asset concealment, including virtual and digital assets.
The proclamation was therefore designed to align Ethiopia’s domestic legal framework with international anti-corruption and asset recovery standards, particularly conventions ratified by Ethiopia such as the United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC). The law also reflects international practices concerning non-conviction-based confiscation and unexplained wealth investigations.
3. Objectives of the Proclamation
One of the central objectives of the proclamation is to prevent individuals and organizations from enjoying proceeds obtained through illegal means. The law aims to strengthen the government’s ability to identify criminal assets, investigate suspicious wealth, freeze property before dissipation, and permanently confiscate illicit proceeds.
Another important objective is the protection of the national economy. The proclamation expressly recognizes that unexplained wealth negatively affects Ethiopia’s taxation system, foreign currency reserves, financial flow, and foreign direct investment. By targeting illicit enrichment and unlawful financial activities, the law seeks to promote transparency, accountability, and economic stability.
The proclamation also intends to create procedural clarity for investigators, prosecutors, courts, and administrative institutions involved in asset recovery proceedings. It establishes rules governing evidence, burden of proof, asset management, confiscation procedures, and protection of third-party rights.
4. Scope of Application
As clearly stipulated under Article 3 of the proclamation, It applies broadly to both natural persons and legal persons falling under Ethiopian jurisdiction. It covers assets obtained through criminal activities as well as unexplained assets whose lawful origin cannot be justified. The law includes movable and immovable property, money, securities, bank accounts, shares, digital assets, and income generated from illegal property. One notable innovation is the explicit inclusion of virtual assets and digital financial instruments within the definition of recoverable assets.
However, certain entities are excluded from the proclamation’s application, including government institutions, religious organizations, political organizations, and international organizations under specific circumstances. The law also has retroactive implications for unexplained wealth claims extending up to ten years before the proclamation’s effective date, provided the asset value meets the statutory threshold.
5. Unexplained Wealth and Burden of Proof
A particularly controversial aspect of the proclamation is its treatment of unexplained wealth. Article 5 of the proclamation provides, a person may be investigated where their assets or lifestyle significantly exceed their lawful income and they fail to provide a satisfactory explanation regarding the source of such wealth.
Unlike traditional criminal proceedings where the prosecution bears the entire burden of proof, the proclamation partially shifts the burden to the person under investigation. Once authorities establish reasonable grounds suggesting disproportionate wealth, the individual must demonstrate the lawful origin of the assets in question. Asset recovery proceedings operate under a civil standard of proof based on a “preponderance of evidence” rather than the stricter criminal standard of proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
Supporters argue that this mechanism is necessary because financial crimes are often concealed through sophisticated methods. Critics, however, contend that reversing the burden of proof may raise constitutional and human rights concerns, especially regarding the presumption of innocence and protection of property rights.
6. Investigation, Freezing, and Seizure Powers
The proclamation grants broad powers to investigators and prosecutors to trace and preserve suspected criminal assets. Courts may issue freezing or seizure orders during investigations, prosecutions, or after conviction if there is sufficient reason to believe the property is connected to unlawful activity.
Importantly, the law permits authorities to freeze assets held not only by suspects but also assets associated with spouses, partners, children, or third parties where there is suspicion that the assets are connected to criminal proceeds. This provision aims to prevent concealment of illegal wealth through family members or proxy ownership arrangements.
The proclamation also contains provisions relating to management of frozen assets to preserve their value pending final court decisions.
7. Non-Conviction-Based Confiscation
One of the most significant innovations introduced by the proclamation on Article 15 is non- conviction-based confiscation. This allows courts to confiscate assets even in situations where no criminal conviction exists, provided there is sufficient evidence establishing that the property originated from unlawful activity or constitutes unexplained wealth.
This mechanism is especially important in cases where suspects flee the country, die before trial, or where criminal prosecution becomes impossible for procedural reasons. Internationally, non- conviction-based confiscation has become an increasingly important tool in combating organized crime, corruption, and illicit financial flows.
Nevertheless, this provision has generated debate among legal scholars because it potentially affects constitutional protections relating to due process and property ownership.
8. Rights of Third Parties
The proclamation recognizes that innocent third parties may have legitimate interests in assets subject to confiscation proceedings. Accordingly, the law allows individuals to challenge confiscation orders by proving that they acquired the property lawfully, acted in good faith, and had no knowledge of the asset’s illegal origin.
This safeguard attempts to balance the state’s interest in recovering illicit assets with the protection of lawful commercial transactions and private property rights.
9. Advantages of the Proclamation
The proclamation introduces several important legal and institutional improvements. First, it creates a unified and comprehensive framework for asset recovery, reducing inconsistencies found in previous laws. Second, it strengthens Ethiopia’s capacity to combat corruption, money laundering, tax evasion, and organized financial crimes. Third, the inclusion of digital and virtual assets reflects awareness of modern financial realities and technological developments.
The law also promotes international cooperation in asset recovery matters and improves Ethiopia’s compliance with international anti-corruption standards. Additionally, the introduction of non- conviction-based confiscation may significantly increase the effectiveness of asset recovery efforts where criminal prosecution is difficult or delayed.
10. Challenges and Criticisms
Despite its strengths, the proclamation faces several criticisms. Legal scholars and practitioners have expressed concerns regarding the reversal of the burden of proof and the use of civil evidentiary standards in confiscation proceedings involving substantial property rights. Some argue that these provisions may conflict with constitutional guarantees relating to due process and the presumption of innocence.
The law’s retroactive application concerning unexplained wealth investigations has also generated debate. Critics contend that retroactive enforcement may create legal uncertainty and expose individuals to liability for conduct occurring before the law entered into force.
11. Conclusion
Asset Recovery Proclamation No. 1364/2025 represents one of the most ambitious legal reforms undertaken by Ethiopia in the field of economic crime prevention and anti-corruption enforcement.
By establishing a comprehensive legal framework for tracing, freezing, confiscating, and recovering illicit assets, the proclamation seeks to strengthen accountability, protect the national economy, and discourage unlawful enrichment.
At the same time, the proclamation raises important constitutional and human rights questions relating to property rights, due process, retroactivity, and evidentiary standards. The long-term success of the law will therefore depend not only on strong enforcement but also on fair judicial interpretation, institutional professionalism, and adherence to constitutional principles.
For any related inquiries, you may contact us at info@dmethiolawyers.com
